optimizationisdead.com

Argument

To anyone who runs a plant— or sits on the board of one.

I want to tell you something that can save you a lot of money and a few wasted years. It isn’t complicated. Most of the people selling to you won’t say it plainly, so I will.

For about thirty years, being good at planning was a real edge. The plant that could figure out the best way to run its work — when every job depends on every other job and the simple rules of thumb fall apart — got more out of the same machines and the same people. That skill was worth a lot, because it was hard and it was rare.

It isn’t rare anymore.

Five years ago, the big planning calculation for a complex plant cost about three hundred dollars to run. Today it costs about two cents. Next year it will cost nothing worth counting. The hard, special thing became cheap and ordinary, like a pocket calculator. When anyone can get the perfect answer in a second for free, being the one who gets it is no longer worth anything.

Here is the part I most want you to hear.

Most plants never even finished catching up to that cheap tool. Maybe yours is one of them. You’re still being told to go get it — hire the analytics people, buy the scheduling system, finally get your planning under control. I’m telling you not to spend the next five years on that. It’s a race that already ended, and the prize is gone. You’d be working hard to win something that stopped being worth winning.

And there’s good news hiding in that.

Because you never handed your plant over to a machine, you’re not stuck the way the big automated shops are. You can skip the dead step and go straight to the part that still matters. Let me tell you what that part is.

Your plant runs on what a few good people carry in their heads. Your shop manager. Your schedulers. The old hands who know which machine runs slow on a hot afternoon and which customer really means it when they say rush. That isn’t a weakness. For now, that’s your whole system, and it mostly works.

But here’s what nobody has checked: whether what those people are chasing on the floor is the same thing you’re trying to do as a business. It almost never is. You may believe the plant is run to make the most money, or to ship every order on time. Down on the floor, it’s quietly run to keep your most expensive machine from sitting idle, or to keep your loudest customer from calling, or to clear the pile of work the boss walks past each morning. Those are not the same goal. The distance between the one you meant and the one you’re actually chasing has a price.

At a plant doing two hundred million dollars in sales, that distance runs around sixteen million dollars a year. About eight cents on every dollar you bring in. I’ll be straight with you: that’s an estimate from a plant about your size. Yours might be twelve, might be twenty. The exact figure isn’t the point. The point is that it’s large, it’s real, and almost no one has ever bothered to measure it.

You won’t find it on any report. The biggest piece — maybe half — is work you never made, because your busiest machine spent the day on the wrong job. You can’t write down a loss for a part you never built. So it sits there, year after year, quiet and expensive.

Now think about the decisions that actually set your year. Every shift, somebody on your floor decides what runs next, who gets pushed ahead, what waits. Those few choices decide whether you make money. They’re made on gut. They’re not written down. And you — the person who has to answer for how the year turns out — don’t see them until the numbers come in, long after you could have changed anything.

When your foreman ignores the schedule, he isn’t being difficult. He knows something the plan doesn’t. Every time he goes his own way, he’s telling you what the floor is really aiming for. That’s worth listening to. Almost nobody does.

So if being good at the math isn’t the edge anymore, what is? Three plain questions:

What are we actually trying to do — in real numbers, not slogans?

Can we see what’s truly happening on the floor right now, instead of a week late?

Who is the person — a name, not a committee — who owns the decisions that carry real money or real risk?

Answer those three and you’ll be ahead of plants ten times your size, because they’re still busy chasing the race that already ended.

Now, here’s the mistake I watch good companies make right at this point. They decide the answer is to build it — hire a team of analysts, buy a big planning system, kick off a two-year project to finally get sophisticated. Ten years ago that might have been worth it. Today it’s backwards. What you’d be building is the cheap, ordinary thing everyone already has, and it changes so fast that whatever you stand up will be dated before it’s finished. You’d be spending real money, year after year, to build a wall that no longer keeps anyone out. Being a sophisticated planning shop used to set you apart. Now it’s just the cost of being in business.

So don’t start a big project. You don’t need a department for this. You need clear judgment at the top — what are we really trying to do, and who owns the calls that matter — at the few moments that count, not a standing operation that bills you every month. It’s better to keep someone close who has already lived this and can tell you the truth in an afternoon than to build and feed all that machinery yourself.

And one more thing, because it matters. The person who is genuinely good at this — who can look at your floor and see what it’s really doing — used to sit in the middle of your company, running the planning. That isn’t where their value is anymore. That kind of judgment belongs near the top now, close to the decisions about what you’re trying to do and who answers for them. If you have someone like that, move them up. If you don’t, borrow one before you build anything.

You don’t have to buy anything to start. Begin by measuring your own gap — about eight weeks, using numbers you already have. See what it’s really costing you. Then draw a simple line between the small decisions that can run on their own and the big ones that need a person to put their name on them. Then name that person. That’s the whole thing.

The tool is free now. What’s not free is knowing what you’re trying to build, and being the one who answers for it. That was always the real job. The cheap tool just made it impossible to hide from any longer.

Take care of your people — and have them measure that number. I think it will surprise you.

optimizationisdead.com

The short version

  1. The planning tool that used to be expensive is now nearly free, so having it isn’t special.
  2. When everyone can get the perfect answer in a second, being fast stops being worth anything.
  3. A faster answer is useless if you’re chasing the wrong goal. Most plants think they’re run to make money, but the floor is really run to keep the big machine busy or the loud customer quiet — not the same thing.
  4. Your plant runs on what a few people carry in their heads, and no one has checked it against the goal.
  5. The choices that decide your year — which job runs next, who gets bumped — are made on the floor by gut, and the owner never sees them until the numbers come in, too late to change.
  6. Your biggest cost — the work you never made — never shows up on a report.
  7. When the floor ignores the plan, that isn’t the problem. It’s the floor telling you what it really wants.

Where does the advantage go from here? To three simple things: knowing what you’re really trying to do, being able to see what’s actually happening, and having a named person own the decisions that matter. And whatever you do, don’t answer this by building a big planning department — that’s the costly, dated move. The value now is judgment at the top, not machinery in the middle. Start by measuring your own number. Eight weeks, your data. Then decide.